Cicero State

Thus, the obvious conclusion, that went unnoticed for Morus, which was the full realization of the Republic only explains when a philosopher or a group of them become leaders of the City-State, which leads us to believe that the implementation of this project would result in short-term, under a totalitarian State. Therefore, freedom, guarantee of the social mobility of the Platonic Republic would be limited to individuals, Governments (and the citizens of guardians) have the domain of a philosophical method. If the person was able to assimilate and use it, it would have a position in the Government. Without, however, all the criticisms raised in the identification of Platonic faults in Republic, regarding equal opportunities and democracy, there is no possibility to see some ideas of Plato, that very well portray a universal truth, as was detected with the help of intuition, because you are involved with the progress of the world and society is a task that implies the permanence of actions to ensure a balance (or half virtus) of the City-State, in basic terms, which he called and absolute. This is probably the principle of Justice, mentioned by Plato, later defined as the Cicero State stability. In the Republic, book IX, we find ourselves with a thought metaphysical explained by a metaphor that it must be related with the knowledge of the stability of fundamental importance for the understanding of the Platonic justice.

Plato says the tyrannical man, as man of democratic causes, which, once formed, and how is their life, happy or unhappy. Making one analogy with the division proposed by the study of the democratic justice, Plato takes (as a transcendental condition), is representing himself (as positive) and how it is your life, is a manifestation of ethics (how functional). However, does not explain the stability of a clear and rational. The metaphor seems sufficient to maintain the effects of fair or unfair conduct.